Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Composites and Resin Cement Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Composites and Resin Cement
Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 20, 2020
Keywords:
Resin cement., Composite resin., Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate. Silorane resins., Dental materials., Dentin-Bonding agents.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on bond strength (BS) between composite and a resin cement trough microshear bond strength test. Seventy five discs (10x2 mm) of Filtek P90, Filtek Z250 and Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE), were divided into 5 groups according to the treatment: C= control - no treatment; sandblasting J= aluminum oxide (50μm); sandblasting JE = + 99.3% ethanol for 5 min; silica coating S = (3M-ESPE Cojet - 30 microns); SS = silica coating + silane. PVC tubes (0.5 x 0.80 mm) were attached on the composite disc, and then, inserted resin cement (3M ESPE-RelyX ARC). After 24 hours artificial saliva storage at 37oC, the specimens were tested for microshear crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Data were evaluated in two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%) for contrast. The results showed that sandblasting with aluminum oxide (J) was efficient in increasing the BS for composites Z350 and P90. For the Z250, there were no difference between treatments. Also, CS showed results similar to controls for all composites. SE showed the worst results for Z350 e P90. BS values were dependent on the type of composite and the surface treatment used. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide seems to be an effective surface treatment for composites and may lead to higher BS values, while the use of ethanol could be harmful.
Article Details
How to Cite
Luisa de Vasconcelos Alves Coelho, Aline Borges de Carvalho, Tatiana Ferreira Foscaldo, Carlos Eduardo Sabrosa, & Laiza Tatiana Poskus. (2020). Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Composites and Resin Cement. Naval Dental Jounal, 47(2), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.47.2-2
Section
Original Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
1. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2007;9(1):25-31.
2. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2009;25(11):1338-46.
3. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(2):171-9.
4. Perriard J, Lorente MC, Scherrer S, Belser UC, Wiskott HW. The effect of water storage, elapsed time and contaminants on the bond strength and interfacial polymerization of a nanohybrid composite. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2009;11(6):469-78.
5. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clinical oral investigations. 2009;13(3):317-23.
6. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate
repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(1):29-38.
7. Rodrigues SA, Jr., Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):442-51.
8. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(2):122-6.
9. Caneppele TM, Zogheib LV, Gomes I, Kuwana AS, Pagani C. Bond strength of a composite resin to an adhesive luting cement. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):322-6.
10. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701-9.
11. Palasuk J, Platt JA, Cho SD, Levon JA, Brown DT, Hovijitra ST. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):91-9.
12. Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W, Taubock TT, Ozcan M, Attin T. Repair of silorane composite--using the same substrate or a methacrylate-based composite? Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):e19-25.
13. Luhrs AK, Gormann B, Jacker-Guhr S, Geurtsen W. Repairability of dental siloranes in vitro. Dent Mater. 2011;27(2):144-9.
14. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 1998;26(8):685-94.
15. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J, Jr., Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2005;7(1):41-9.
16. Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302.
17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Polymer structure of a light-cured resin composite in relation to distance from the surface. European journal of oral sciences. 2003;111(3):277-9.
18. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2006;22(3):211-22.
19. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2007;23(4):519-25.
20. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(1):21-7.
21. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Baldini M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Reparability of aged silorane with methacrylate-based resin composite: micro-shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Operative dentistry. 2012;37(1):28-36.
22. Dieckmann P, Baur A, Dalvai V, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Effect of Composite Age on the Repair Bond Strength after Different Mechanical Surface Pretreatments. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(4):365-372.
23. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. Journal of dentistry. 2008;36(7):560-3.
24. Silva CLD, Scherer MM, Mendes LT, Casagrande L, Leitune VCB, Lenzi TL. Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair? Braz Oral Res. 2020;34(8):45.
25. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513-21.
26. Melo MA, Moyses MR, Santos SG, Alcantara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Brazilian oral research. 2011;25(6):485-91.
27. Caneppele TM, de Souza AC, Batista GR, Borges AB, Torres CR. Influence of Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composites to resin cement. Lasers surface treatment of indirect resin composites. The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. 2012;20(3):135-40.
28. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e38-49.
29. Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. American journal of dentistry. 2002;15(6):373-7.
30. Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Operative dentistry. 1999;24(3):156-61.
31. Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clinical
Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17(2):601-8.
32. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2011;27(2):e20-7.
33. Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hickel R, et al. Repair of silorane-based dental composites: influence of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):894-902.
34. Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry [et al]. 2009;21(4):251-60.
35. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments. American journal of dentistry. 2001;14(6):373-7.
36. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. Journal of dentistry. 2008;36(12):969-76.
37. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(7):499-505.
38. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2003;19(8):725-31.
39. Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Operative dentistry. 2011;36(6):608-17.
40. Schneider LF, Moraes RR, Cavalcante LM, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, Consani S. Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: effect of ethanol concentration. Dent Mater. 2008;24(2):199-203.
2. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2009;25(11):1338-46.
3. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(2):171-9.
4. Perriard J, Lorente MC, Scherrer S, Belser UC, Wiskott HW. The effect of water storage, elapsed time and contaminants on the bond strength and interfacial polymerization of a nanohybrid composite. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2009;11(6):469-78.
5. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clinical oral investigations. 2009;13(3):317-23.
6. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate
repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(1):29-38.
7. Rodrigues SA, Jr., Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):442-51.
8. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(2):122-6.
9. Caneppele TM, Zogheib LV, Gomes I, Kuwana AS, Pagani C. Bond strength of a composite resin to an adhesive luting cement. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):322-6.
10. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701-9.
11. Palasuk J, Platt JA, Cho SD, Levon JA, Brown DT, Hovijitra ST. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):91-9.
12. Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W, Taubock TT, Ozcan M, Attin T. Repair of silorane composite--using the same substrate or a methacrylate-based composite? Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):e19-25.
13. Luhrs AK, Gormann B, Jacker-Guhr S, Geurtsen W. Repairability of dental siloranes in vitro. Dent Mater. 2011;27(2):144-9.
14. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 1998;26(8):685-94.
15. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J, Jr., Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2005;7(1):41-9.
16. Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302.
17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Polymer structure of a light-cured resin composite in relation to distance from the surface. European journal of oral sciences. 2003;111(3):277-9.
18. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2006;22(3):211-22.
19. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2007;23(4):519-25.
20. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(1):21-7.
21. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Baldini M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Reparability of aged silorane with methacrylate-based resin composite: micro-shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Operative dentistry. 2012;37(1):28-36.
22. Dieckmann P, Baur A, Dalvai V, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Effect of Composite Age on the Repair Bond Strength after Different Mechanical Surface Pretreatments. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(4):365-372.
23. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. Journal of dentistry. 2008;36(7):560-3.
24. Silva CLD, Scherer MM, Mendes LT, Casagrande L, Leitune VCB, Lenzi TL. Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair? Braz Oral Res. 2020;34(8):45.
25. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513-21.
26. Melo MA, Moyses MR, Santos SG, Alcantara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Brazilian oral research. 2011;25(6):485-91.
27. Caneppele TM, de Souza AC, Batista GR, Borges AB, Torres CR. Influence of Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser surface treatment on microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composites to resin cement. Lasers surface treatment of indirect resin composites. The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. 2012;20(3):135-40.
28. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e38-49.
29. Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. American journal of dentistry. 2002;15(6):373-7.
30. Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Operative dentistry. 1999;24(3):156-61.
31. Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clinical
Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17(2):601-8.
32. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2011;27(2):e20-7.
33. Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hickel R, et al. Repair of silorane-based dental composites: influence of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):894-902.
34. Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry [et al]. 2009;21(4):251-60.
35. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments. American journal of dentistry. 2001;14(6):373-7.
36. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. Journal of dentistry. 2008;36(12):969-76.
37. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(7):499-505.
38. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2003;19(8):725-31.
39. Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Operative dentistry. 2011;36(6):608-17.
40. Schneider LF, Moraes RR, Cavalcante LM, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, Consani S. Cross-link density evaluation through softening tests: effect of ethanol concentration. Dent Mater. 2008;24(2):199-203.