Indirect Bonding Using CAD/CAM Systems: Description of the Technique Colagem Indireta por Meio de Sistemas CAD/CAM: Descrição da Técnica

Article Sidebar

PDF (Português (Brasil)) PDF
Published: Jun 12, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.47.1-7
Keywords:
Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed., Orthodontic Bracket., Dental Bonding.

Main Article Content

Elizângela de Sampaio Azevedo da Silva
Military Firefighter Polyclinic
Ana Sabaneeff
Marinha do Brasil, Odontoclínica Central da Marinha

Abstract

New indirect bonding technologies have assumed an important role
in Orthodontics to obtain increasingly accurate clinical results in orthodontic
treatments. With the development of means of obtaining
and manipulating digital images, the possibility to carry out orthodontic
planning in the virtual environment arose, simulating the desired
result, as well as the best positioning of orthodontic accessories on
teeth to achieve this goal. The possibility of three-dimensional printing
using CAD/CAM technology allowed the guide for the transfer of brackets,
in indirect bonding, to be made directly in the software after digital
planning of their position. Currently, some companies have made
programs available or offered the possibility of executing digital planning,
customized brackets, personalized arches and guides for indirect
bonding. This article aims to perform a literature review, gathering
recent information on indirect bonding using the CAD/CAM system
in relation to bonding accuracy and time of orthodontic treatment.
It is concluded that the indirect bonding using CAD/CAM systems
presents reliability in relation to the precision of the positioning of
brackets. Regarding the treatment time, several studies suggest that
it was reduced with the method, however, the variety of existing techniques
and software, in addition to the diversity of scientific methods,
indicate the need for further investigations. Despite this, indirect digital
bonding has proved to be an interesting option to be incorporated

Article Details

How to Cite
de Sampaio Azevedo da Silva, E., & Sabaneeff, A. (2020). Indirect Bonding Using CAD/CAM Systems: Description of the Technique. Naval Dental Jounal, 47(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.47.1-7
Issue
Vol 47 No 1 (2020): Dental Naval Journal
Section
Literature Reviews
Author Biographies

Elizângela de Sampaio Azevedo da Silva, Military Firefighter Polyclinic

Dentist surgeon; Specialist in Orthodontics, Policlínica Bombeiro Militar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Ana Sabaneeff, Marinha do Brasil, Odontoclínica Central da Marinha

Dentist surgeon; Specialist and Master in Orthodontics, Central Odontoclínica da Marinha, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

References

1. Accorsi M. Colagem Indireta precisa por meio de Sistema
CAD/CAM. Ortodontia SPO. 2017; 50(5): 416-22.
2. Martins IP, Martins RP, Magno AF, Araújo AM, Martins LP.
Tratamento ortodôntico lingual individualizado com o sistema
Incognito. Rev Clin Orthod Dental Press. 2012 jun-jul;
11(3):30-7.
3. Nojima LI, Araújo AS, Alves Junior M. Indirect orthodontic
bonding – a modified technique for improved efficiency and
precision. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015. 20(3):109-17.
4. Gange P. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. American Association of OrthoRevista
N aval de Odontologia - 2020 - Volume 47 Número 1 53
dontists. 2015; 147(94):56-63.
5. Aksakalli S, Demir A. Indirect bonding: A literature review.
Eur J Gen Dent. 2012; 1(1): 6.
6. Ferreira FV, Souza MV, Ferreira AC , Ferreira FA, Macedo
AM. Colagem indireta de bráquetes: apresentação de uma técnica
passo-a-passo. Rev Assoc Cir Dent 2015; 69(3): 236-40.
7. Guenthner TA, Larson BE. Indirect bonding: A Techique for
Precision and Efficiency. Semin Orthod. 2007;13(1):58-63
8. Joiner M. In-house precision bracket placement with the
indirect bonding technique. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
2010; 137(6):850-4
9. Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grunhei T. Effectiveness of computer-
-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted
outcomes. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(4):557-62.
10. Bozelli JV, Bigliazzi R, Barbosa HAM, Ortolani CLF, Bertoz
FA, Junior KF. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket
bonding techiques regarding time length and bracket detachment.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(6):51-7
11. Kalange JT, Thomas RG. Indirect Bonding: A comprehensive
Review of the Literature. Semin Orthod. 2007; 13(1):3-10.
12. Rajagopal R, VanKatesan A, Gnanashanmugham K, Harish
Babu S. A new indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod. 2004;
38(11):600-2.
13. Brown M, Koroluk L, Ko L, K Zhang K, Chen M, Nguyen
T. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic
bracket system. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;
148(6):1067-74
14. Mezomo M, de Lima EMS, de Menezes LM, Weissheimer A.
Indirect bonding with thermal glue and brackets with positioning
jigs. Prog Orthod. 2011; 12(2):180-5.
15. Wedl B, Droschl H Muchitsch P. Indirect bonding – A new
transfer method. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30(1):100-7.
16. Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP, Spary DJ. A randomized
clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect
bracket placement. J Orthod 2004; 31(2): 132-7
17. Nichols DA, Gardner G, Garballeyra AD, Marsh CM. Reproducibility
of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013.
18. Ciuffolo F, Epifania E, De Luca V, Raviglia D, Rezza S. Rapid
prototyping: A new method of preparing trays for indirect
bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 129(1):75-7.
19. Son KH, Park, Lee DK, Kim KD, Baek SH. New virtual orthodontic
treatment system for indirect bonding using the stereolithographic
technique. Korean J Orthod. 2011; 41(2)138-46.
20. Garino F, Garino GB. Computer-aided interactive indirect
bonding. Prog Orthod. 2005; 6(2):214-23.
21. El-Timamy AM, El-Sharaby FA, Eid FH, Mostafa YA. Three-
-dimensional imaging for indirect-direct bonding. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop. 2016; 149(6):928-31.
22. Redmond R, M, M. Computer-Aided Bracket Placement for
Indirect Bonding. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 309(11):653-60.
23. Israel M, Kusnoto B, Evans CA, Begole E. A comparison of
traditional and computer-aided bracket placement methods.
Angle Orthod. 2011;81(5):828-35.
24. Aldrees AM. Do customized orthodontic appliances and
vibration devices provide more efficient treatment than conventional
methods? Korean J Orthod; 2016; 46(3):180.
25. Weber D, Koroluk L, Phillips C, Nguyen T, Proffit W. Clinical
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Customized vs. Conventional
Preadjusted Bracket Systems. J Clin Orthod 2013; 158(4):261-6.
26. Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with
a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop. 2011; 140(3):433-43.
27. Müller-Hartwich R, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schubert K. Precision
of implementing virtual setups for orthodontic treatment
using CAD/CAM-fabricated custom archwires. J Orofac Orthop.
2016; 77(1):1-8.
28. OH JY, Park JW, Bark SH. Surgery-first approach in class III
open-bite. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23(4):283-287.
29. Kim J, Chun YS, Kim M. Accuracy of bracket positions with
a CAD/CAM indirect bonding system in posterior teeth with
different cusp heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;
153(2):298-307.
30. Garino F, Garino GB. Computer-aided interactive indirect
bonding. Prog Orthod. 2005;6(2):214-23.
31. Saxe AK, Louie LI, Mah J. Efficiency and effectiveness of
SureSmile. World J Orthod 2010; 11(1):16-22.
32. Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Eckert GJ, Snyder RJ.
Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile method
compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy.
Angle Orthod 2011; 81(3)383-388.
33. Yanxi Li , Li Mei , Jieya Wei , Xinyu Yan , Xu Zhang , Wei
Zheng and Yu Li. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of
using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Heath
2019; 19:137.