Influência de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união entre compósitos e cimento resinoso
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado:
Jan 7, 2022
Palavras-chave:
Abrasão de partículas, Interação química, Teste de microcisalhamento, Resina composta, Pré-tratamento de superfície
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Objetivo: Avaliar a influência de tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união (RU) entre compósitos e um cimento resinoso. Materiais e Métodos: - 75 discos (10x2 mm) das resinas Filtek P90, Filtek Z250 e Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE), divididos em 5 grupos de acordo com o tratamento: N= sem tratamento; S= jateamento com óxido de alumínio (50μm); SE= jateamento de óxido de alumínio + 99,3% de etanol por 5 min; C= jateamento de sílica com Cojet - 30 microns (3M ESPE); CS= jateamento de sílica + silano. Tubos de PVC (0,5 x 0,80 mm) foram fixados nos discos e o cimento resinoso (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE) foi inserido. Após 24 horas de armazenamento em saliva artificial a 37oC, os espécimes foram testados com velocidade de 1,0 mm/min. Os dados foram avaliados em ANOVA de dois fatores e no teste de Tukey (5%) para contraste. Resultados: O tratamento S foi eficiente no aumento da RU nos compósitos Filtek Z350 e P90. Com exceção do tratamento com etanol, os demais tratamentos não foram capazes de melhorar a RU para o Z250. Além disso, CS mostrou resultados semelhantes aos do controle para todos os compósitos. Conclusão: Os valores de RU foram dependentes do tipo de compósito e do tratamento de superfície utilizado. O jateamento com óxido de alumínio parece ser um tratamento de superfície eficaz e pode elevar os valores de RU, já o uso de etanol pode ser prejudicial.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
Luisa Vasconcelos Alves. (2022). Influência de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união entre compósitos e cimento resinoso. Revista Naval De Odontologia, 47(2). Recuperado de http://portaldeperiodicos.marinha.mil.br/index.php/odontoclinica/article/view/1139
Seção
Artigos Originais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Referências
Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. JDR. 2010;89(6):549-60.
2. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. JDR. 2008;87(8):710-9.
3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--state of the art. Dent. Mat. 2011;27(1):29-38.
4. Albaladejo A, Osorio R, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Post silanization improves bond strength of translucent posts to flowable composite resins. J Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Applied biomaterials. 2007;82(2):320-4.
5. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. ADJ. 2011;56 Suppl 1:77-83.
6. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent. Mat. 2005;21(5):437-44.
7. Papacchini F, Dall'Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. JAD. 2007;9(1):25-31.
8. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent. Mat. 2009;25(11):1338-46.
9. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? J. Dent. 2011;39(2):171-9.
10. Perriard J, Lorente MC, Scherrer S, Belser UC, Wiskott HW. The effect of water storage, elapsed time and contaminants on the bond strength and interfacial polymerization of a nanohybrid composite.JAD. 2009;11(6):469-78.
11. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;13(3):317-23.
12. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J. Dent. 2010;38(1):29-38.
13. Rodrigues SA, Jr., Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):442-51.
14. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. JPD. 1997;77(2):122-6.
15. Caneppele TM, Zogheib LV, Gomes I, Kuwana AS, Pagani C. Bond strength of a composite resin to an adhesive luting cement. Braz. Dent. J. 2010;21(4):322-6.
16. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701-9.
17. Palasuk J, Platt JA, Cho SD, Levon JA, Brown DT, Hovijitra ST. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper. Dent. 2013;38(1):91-9.
18. Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W, Taubock TT, Ozcan M, Attin T. Repair of silorane composite--using the same substrate or a methacrylate-based composite? Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):e19-25.
2. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. JDR. 2008;87(8):710-9.
3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--state of the art. Dent. Mat. 2011;27(1):29-38.
4. Albaladejo A, Osorio R, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Post silanization improves bond strength of translucent posts to flowable composite resins. J Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Applied biomaterials. 2007;82(2):320-4.
5. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. ADJ. 2011;56 Suppl 1:77-83.
6. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent. Mat. 2005;21(5):437-44.
7. Papacchini F, Dall'Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. JAD. 2007;9(1):25-31.
8. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent. Mat. 2009;25(11):1338-46.
9. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? J. Dent. 2011;39(2):171-9.
10. Perriard J, Lorente MC, Scherrer S, Belser UC, Wiskott HW. The effect of water storage, elapsed time and contaminants on the bond strength and interfacial polymerization of a nanohybrid composite.JAD. 2009;11(6):469-78.
11. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;13(3):317-23.
12. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J. Dent. 2010;38(1):29-38.
13. Rodrigues SA, Jr., Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):442-51.
14. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. JPD. 1997;77(2):122-6.
15. Caneppele TM, Zogheib LV, Gomes I, Kuwana AS, Pagani C. Bond strength of a composite resin to an adhesive luting cement. Braz. Dent. J. 2010;21(4):322-6.
16. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701-9.
17. Palasuk J, Platt JA, Cho SD, Levon JA, Brown DT, Hovijitra ST. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper. Dent. 2013;38(1):91-9.
18. Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Buchalla W, Taubock TT, Ozcan M, Attin T. Repair of silorane composite--using the same substrate or a methacrylate-based composite? Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):e19-25.