Influência da Cinemática de Instrumentação no Preparo do Sistema de Canais Radiculares: uma Revisão Sistemática de Estudos por Microtomografia Computadorizada Influence of Instrumentation Kinematics on Root Canal System Preparation: a Sytematics Review of Studies by Microcomputed Tomography
Barra lateral de artigos
Publicado:
jun 30, 2022
Palavras-chave:
Endodontia, Preparo de Canal Radicular, Microtomografia por Raio-X
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar uma revisão sistemática dos estudos que avaliaram por microtomografia computadorizada (micro-CT) as áreas não tocadas do canal radicular após o preparo com cinemática rotatória continua e reciprocante. Foram utilizadas estratégias eletrônicas de busca nas bases LILACS, PubMed (MedLine), Science Direct, Cochrane, Scopus e Web of Science. Uma busca adicional por literatura cinzenta foi realizada no Google Scholar, OpenGrey e ProQuest. A busca abrangeu estudos em inglês, português e espanhol, sem restrição em relação ao tempo de publicação. Adicionalmente, pesquisas manuais foram realizadas na lista de referências dos artigos incluídos. Os artigos selecionados foram estudos in vitro que avaliaram por micro-CT a porcentagem de áreas não tocadas após o preparo do canal radicular, comparando as cinemáticas rotatórias e reciprocante. No total 11 estudos foram selecionados para análise qualitativa e quantitativa. Um estudo mostrou que o sistema Reciproc (reciprocante) tem uma porcentagem menor de paredes não tocadas do canal em incisivos inferiores, quando comparado com o sistema BioRace (rotatório). Outro estudo não mostrou diferenças significativas entre os sistemas reciprocantes Reciproc e WaveOne e o sistema BioRace em canais radiculares mesiais de molares inferiores. Da mesma forma, não foram observadas diferenças entre ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal (rotatórios) e WaveOne. Um único estudo apresentou diferenças entre as cinemáticas, XP-Endo Shaper (rotatório) mostrou maior porcentagem de áreas tocadas quando comparado com TRUShape e WaveOne Gold. Os estudos avaliados mostraram que nenhum dos sistemas de instrumentação, independente da cinemática, foi capaz de tocar completamente as paredes dos canais radiculares.
Detalhes do artigo
Como Citar
Influência da Cinemática de Instrumentação no Preparo do Sistema de Canais Radiculares: uma Revisão Sistemática de Estudos por Microtomografia Computadorizada : Influence of Instrumentation Kinematics on Root Canal System Preparation: a Sytematics Review of Studies by Microcomputed Tomography. (2022). Revista Naval De Odontologia, 49(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.49.1-2
Seção
Artigos Originais
Como Citar
Influência da Cinemática de Instrumentação no Preparo do Sistema de Canais Radiculares: uma Revisão Sistemática de Estudos por Microtomografia Computadorizada : Influence of Instrumentation Kinematics on Root Canal System Preparation: a Sytematics Review of Studies by Microcomputed Tomography. (2022). Revista Naval De Odontologia, 49(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.49.1-2
Referências
1. Gomes BPFA, Herrera DR. Etiologic role of root canal infection in apical periodontitis and its relationship with clinical symptomatology. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32(suppl 1):e69. 2. Marzouk AM, Ghoneim AG. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod. 2013 Jul;39(7):906-9. 3. Zhao D. Shen Y. Peng B, Hasapasalo M. Root Canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1860-4. 4. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals Part 1. Int Endod J. 1997 Jan;30(1):1-7. 5. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator´s proficiency on ProFile failures. Int Endod J. 2001 Jan;34(1):47-53. 6. Da Silva Limoeiro AG, Dos Santos AH, De Martin AS, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of 2 nickeltitanium instrument systems in shaping root Canals. J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):496-9. 7. Brasil SC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Marques ML, et al. Canal transportation, unprepared áreas, and dentin removal after preparation with BT-Race and ProTaper Next Systems. J Endod. 2017 Oct;43(10):1683-7. 8. Vera J, Siqueira Jr JF , Ricucci D, et al. One- versus twovisit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):104052. 9. Bramante C, Berbert A, Borges R. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod. 1987 May;13(5):243-5. 10. Shivashankar MB, Niranjan NT, Jayasheel A, Kenchanagoudra MG. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):ZC10-ZC14.
Revista Naval de Odontologia - 2022 - Volume 49 Número 124
11. Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, SouzaNeto MD. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper, iRace, and EdgeFile systems in long oval shaped canals. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):489-95. 12. Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Tperovich E, Paqué F. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1569-73. 13. Moura-Netto C, Palo RM, Pinto LF, Mello-Moura AC, Daltoe , Wilhelmsen NS. CT study of the performance of reciprocating and oscillatory motions in flattened root canal areas. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-6. 14. Peters OA, Schönenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):221-30. 15. Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F. Threedimensional analysis of root canal geometry by highresolution computed tomography. J Dent Res. 2000 Jun;79(6):1405-9. 16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. 17. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. 18. Yuan G, Yang G. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals. J Dent Sci. 2018 Mar;13(1):37-42. 19. Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Cunha RS, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF. Preparation of ovalshaped canals with TRUShape and Reciproc systems: a micro–computed tomography study using contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):1018-22. 20. Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, Gavini G, Machado ME, Santos M. A micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using reciprocating or rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2015 Oct;48(10):1001-6.
21. Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2018 May;51(5):564-71. 22. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cavenago BC, Hungaro Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M. Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3189-94. 23. Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, et al. Micro–computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the Self-adjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper Universal systems. J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):1060-6. 24. De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of non-instrumented canal areas with different enlargements performed by NiTi systems. Braz Dent J. Nov-Dec 2015;26(6):624-9 25. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro–computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1860-4. 26. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomographybased comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1394-7. 27. Poly A, Marques F, Moura Sassone L, Karabucak B. The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems in oval-shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomographic analysis. Int Endod J. 2021 Dec;54(12):2300-6. 28. da Silva EJNL, de Moura SG, de Lima CO, et al. Shaping ability and apical debris extrusion after root canal preparation with rotary or reciprocating instruments: a micro-CT study. Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Feb 25;46(2):e16. 29. Medeiros TC, Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, et al. Shaping ability of reciprocating and rotary systems in oval-shaped root canals: a microcomputed tomography study. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021 Dec 31;34(3):282-288. 30. Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):8-16.
Revista Naval de Odontologia - 2022 - Volume 49 Número 124
11. Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, SouzaNeto MD. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper, iRace, and EdgeFile systems in long oval shaped canals. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):489-95. 12. Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Tperovich E, Paqué F. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1569-73. 13. Moura-Netto C, Palo RM, Pinto LF, Mello-Moura AC, Daltoe , Wilhelmsen NS. CT study of the performance of reciprocating and oscillatory motions in flattened root canal areas. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1-6. 14. Peters OA, Schönenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001 Apr;34(3):221-30. 15. Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F. Threedimensional analysis of root canal geometry by highresolution computed tomography. J Dent Res. 2000 Jun;79(6):1405-9. 16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. 17. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. 18. Yuan G, Yang G. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals. J Dent Sci. 2018 Mar;13(1):37-42. 19. Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano-Alves MF, Cunha RS, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF. Preparation of ovalshaped canals with TRUShape and Reciproc systems: a micro–computed tomography study using contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):1018-22. 20. Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, Gavini G, Machado ME, Santos M. A micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using reciprocating or rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2015 Oct;48(10):1001-6.
21. Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2018 May;51(5):564-71. 22. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cavenago BC, Hungaro Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M. Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3189-94. 23. Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, et al. Micro–computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the Self-adjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper Universal systems. J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):1060-6. 24. De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of non-instrumented canal areas with different enlargements performed by NiTi systems. Braz Dent J. Nov-Dec 2015;26(6):624-9 25. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro–computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1860-4. 26. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomographybased comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1394-7. 27. Poly A, Marques F, Moura Sassone L, Karabucak B. The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems in oval-shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomographic analysis. Int Endod J. 2021 Dec;54(12):2300-6. 28. da Silva EJNL, de Moura SG, de Lima CO, et al. Shaping ability and apical debris extrusion after root canal preparation with rotary or reciprocating instruments: a micro-CT study. Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Feb 25;46(2):e16. 29. Medeiros TC, Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, et al. Shaping ability of reciprocating and rotary systems in oval-shaped root canals: a microcomputed tomography study. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021 Dec 31;34(3):282-288. 30. Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):8-16.