The relationship between posterior tooth loss and functional oral rehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22491/1983-7550-52-2-R3Keywords:
Tooth loss, Dental prosthesis, Dental implant, Chewing, Chewing function, Oral healthAbstract
The loss of posterior teeth significantly impairs masticatory function, occlusion, and patients’ quality of life, potentially leading to bone resorption and nutritional difficulties. Oral rehabilitation is essential to restore these functions. Various techniques have been employed, such as fixed, removable, and implant-supported prostheses. The choice of approach depends on factors such as the extent of tooth loss, bone condition, and patient needs. This study aimed to analyze the clinical implications of posterior tooth loss and the main available oral rehabilitation techniques. A descriptive and qualitative literature review was conducted based on the analysis of recent scientific articles on the subject. Results showed that the absence of posterior teeth overloads the remaining teeth, causes progressive bone resorption, and impairs aesthetics and function. Among rehabilitation techniques, dental implants demonstrated superior efficacy in bone preservation and functional stability, whereas removable prostheses remain widely used due to their accessibility and applicability in patients with bone or financial restrictions. The choice of rehabilitation technique should be individualized considering clinical and socioeconomic factors. Advances in materials and dental technologies have enabled more efficient rehabilitations, contributing to the improvement of patients’ quality of life.
References
1. Cavalcante FT, Moura C, Perazzo PAT, Cavalcante FT, Cavalcante MT. Prevalência de dificuldade na mastigação e fatores associados em adultos de 20 a 59 anos em Patos, Paraíba, Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24(3):1015-1024.
2. Bitencourt FV, Corrêa HW, Toassi RFC. Experiências de perda dentária em adultos e idosos usuários da Atenção Primária à Saúde. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24(1):169-180.
3. Souza HLF, Souza Neto HF, Almeida RAC. Preservação alveolar e instalação tardia de implante dentário: relato de caso clínico. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2022;22(3):32-39.
4. Antelo OM, Caballero GC, Amadi AK, Schneider NA, Tanaka OM. Abordagem interdisciplinar do tratamento em paciente adulto com múltiplas perdas dentárias. Orthod Sci Pract. 2019;12(47):94-102.
5. Silva BF, Moretti ABS, Gasque KCS, Neto RTM. Avaliação da performance mastigatória e nível de satisfação de usuários de prótese parcial removível: ênfase na importância das PPRs na era da implantodontia. Re Soc Dev. 2022;11(7):e1811729550.
6. Sette LCF. Princípios fisiológicos da oclusão aplicados em reabilitação oral: relato de caso [monografia]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2018.
7. Chen F, Chen JH, Jeng JH, Akifusa S, Liu HY. Association and relevant factors between objective masticatory performance and subjective masticatory ability among community-dwelling older adults. J Dent Sci. 2025;20(1):69-76.
8. Homsi G, Karlsson A, Almotairy N, Trulsson M, Kumar A, Grigoriadis A. Subjective and objective assessment of masticatory function in patients with implant‑supported bimaxillary prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(2):140-149.
9. Souza JGS, Lages VA, Sampaio AA, Souza TCS, Martins AMEBL. A falta de dentição funcional está associada ao comprometimento das funções bucais entre adultos brasileiros. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24(1):253‑259.
10. Garcia AAMN, Fioravanti KS, Rangel BT, Sugio CYC, Porto VC, Soares S, Neppelenbroek KH. Reabilitação oral com próteses parciais removíveis após restabelecimento de dimensão vertical de oclusão e tratamento multidisciplinar: relato de caso. Rev Odontol Araçatuba. 2023;44(2):24-29.
11. Lopez-Cordon MA, Khoury-Ribas L, Rovira-Lastra B, Ayuso-Montero R, Martinez-Gomis J. Improved Masticatory Performance in the Partially Edentulous Rehabilitated with Conventional Dental Prostheses. Medicina. 2024;60(11):1790.
12. Cristiano DP, Collodel A, Ceretta LB, Simões PW, Ceretta RA, Sônego FGF. Avaliação do desempenho e satisfação dos usuários de próteses totais mucossuportadas fornecidas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde em município catarinense. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo. 2018;30(2):116-131.
13. Raffat EM, Shady M, Elkashty AAR, El Syad M. Comparative analysis of implant survival, peri‑implant health, and patient satisfaction among three treatment modalities in atrophic posterior mandibles: a randomized clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):939.
14. Qiu A, Xu L, Zhang Y, Chen K, Fang S, Zhang Y, Zhong L, He R. Digital‑assisted multidisciplinary treatment for complex occlusal rehabilitation: an 18‑month follow‑up case report. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):818.
15. Silva ET, Oliveira RT, Leles CR. Fatores associados ao edentulismo funcional em idosos brasileiros. Comun Ciências Saúde. 2016;27(2):129-138.
16. Lima ALO. Avaliação da performance mastigatória, força máxima de mordida e fluxo salivar em pacientes idosos edentados reabilitados com dois tipos de próteses [tese de doutorado]. Araraquara (SP): Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2022.
17. Silva MES, Magalhães CS, Ferreira EF. Perda dentária e expectativa da reposição protética: estudo qualitativo. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2010;15(3):813-820.
18. Thieu MKL, Mauland EK, Verket A. Satisfaction and preferences among patients with both implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81(5):358-362.
19. Possebon APR, Schuster AJ, Chagas‑Júnior OL, Pinto LR, Faot F. Prosthetic aftercare, mastication, and quality of life in mandibular overdenture wearers with narrow implants: a 3‑year cohort study. J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103880.
20. Nickenig HJ, Terheyden H, Reich RH, Kreppel M, Linz C, Lentzen MP. Oral health-related quality of life and implant therapy: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;44(6):753-757.
21. Piva JSS. Novos materiais livres de metal para restaurações estéticas em reabilitação oral [tese de doutorado]. São José dos Campos: Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”; 2024.
22. Azevedo FP. Incidência de fraturas em próteses fixas: estudo retrospectivo. Análise da sobrevivência de próteses metalocerâmicas após um período mínimo de quatro anos em função [tese de doutorado]. Bauru: Universidade de São Paulo; 2017.
23. Arefnia B, Fakheran O, Jakse N, Payer M. Patient‑reported outcomes of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review and future directions. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jan 14;9(1):7.
24. Țap MD, Bîcleşanu FC, Honțaru O‑S, Radu A‑C. Patient Centricity—An Empirical Research on Titanium Dental Implants and Their Adverse Effects on Health Condition. Healthcare. 2024;12(22):2207.
25. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Terheyden H, Kreppel M. Oral health-related quality of life and implant therapy: a prospective multicenter study of preoperative, intermediate, and posttreatment assessment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;44(6):753-757.
26. Stavropoulos A, Bertl K, Isidor F, von Steyern PV. Implantoplasty and the risk of fracture of narrow implants with advanced bone loss: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Oct;34(10):1038-1046.
27. Amer DM, Abdellatif AM. In vivo evaluation of the enamel wear of primary molar against four types of crowns using the intra‑oral scanner. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):1438.
28. Vogt L, Pretzl B, Eickholz P, Ramich T, Nickles K, Petsos H. Oral health‑related quality of life and patient‑reported outcome measures after 10 years of supportive periodontal care. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2851-2864.
29. Van de Winkel T, Delfos F, van Oirschot B, Maal T, Adang E, Meijer G. Budget impact analysis: digital workflow significantly reduces costs of implant supported overdentures (IODs). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13413.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naval Dental Jounal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
